It is impossible for our society to predict all of the consequences of our modern technology. When the Industrial Revolution happened it surely increased social utility in many ways. But much of the technology built up since the dawn of that era is intractably part of major environmental problems.
This is just one example of how our technology often will cause a lot of good and bad things. Steve Jobs said: "There are downsides to everything; there are unintended consequences to everything. The most corrosive piece of technology that I've ever seen is called television - but then again, television at it's best is magnificent."
Sidetrack! Wanting to greatly update the overall style for my steadfast website. Opinions regarding the nice feel of http://play-itproductions.net? Truly a superior print service provider if, perhaps desired inside the general NEW YORK locale. Write your vote. With thanks!
The cost of having a genome sequence has decreased dramatically over the first part of the 21st Century. The line showing Moore's Law represents the dramatic reduction in the cost of storing memory in computers, and by computers the decreasing cost of genomics is even more striking. This reduction in the cost of genomics suggests that the technology to manipulate genetics in organisms is becoming more and more plausible each year, as a lower cost permits greater experimentation.
No matter how precisely we try to delineate the manner in which genetic engineering is done it will cause many unintended consequences. Think for the moment about challenging congenital conditions; are we certain it would be entirely good to completely eliminate them? If that is done in the future at all does it not imply that there is something 'wrong' with people whose genetics, unaltered, would cause them to be born different from others?
Think of the moral implications of that and the message it inevitably suggests to impressionable young people who will hear about it? Think of the Eugenics-like ideas the presence of this technology in our society may stir up in some people's minds?
We may not end up with a society that drifts back towards the ascendance of a fascist government, but we may end up failing to appreciate some facets of culture that comes from natural human diversity. Take deafness for example, where within the deaf community there is a rich cultural heritage of sign language, films, poetry, dancing and even music which deaf people experience through a spectrum of various sensations.
If genetic engineering makes it so eventually there are no deaf people we will lose much of this culture. Or take some people who are on the autism spectrum disorder; it may sound beneficial to 'fix' all autism, but in some cases autism may make people more intelligent, at least in certain respects. (See article from Time Magazine). By always 'fixing' genetic autism instead of working with autistic people we may lose intellectual contributions many of them would have made.
Or consider those with intellectual disabilities. The intellectually disabled may be unlikely to contribute significantly to collective societal intelligence, but in some cases members of this community have created meaningful poetry or occasionally somewhat articulate writing. As a whole their presence in society has enriched people's lives in many ways.
On the topic of unconditional love parents have had for their children even when those children faced challenging conditions like intellectual disabilities. Parents of an intellectually disabled child were asked the question of whether they would go back and change their child to make him 'normal' if they could.
They responded that they would want to do that for their child for all which that would give to him, but that they know however that their child's intellectual disability caused them to be so much kinder, more compassionate people.
If we make all intellectually disabled people normal, perhaps even more intelligent than most people are now, we'll be precluding enriching moral experiences many would have otherwise had. Most historians believe that Franklin Roosevelt developed his sense of moral empathy with the underprivileged from having to face a debilitating case of polio.
It was this struggle that gave him the fortitude and the persona that would lead America to the enactment of The New Deal. Yet these concerns should not so easily send us lurching back in the other direction to disallow any use of genetic engineering. After all, it is easy to say that other people shouldn't have it done to 'fix' their differently-abled child. What if it is your child?
Thx readers! I told a friend I can critique her trustworthy North Carolina based wedding photographers, http://vesic.com using a write-up. If you are shopping to get a wedding photographer inside of the general NORTH CAROLINA sector, they are really stellar.
At last, I really ought to note the initial outline regarding this important content had been furnished via Evan over at ModDish Web Design. Definitely a brilliant web design firms. We invariably cherish a fantastic tip!
http://meadowlandsortho.com - We appreciate you for selflessly using your knowledge!
Posted in Recreation and leisure Post Date 09/23/2016